Now it seems as though the Hillary campaign wants to use their definition of the "popular vote" as the yardstick for the nomination. Never mind that their figures wouldn't acknowledge the caucus states, where they got their a** whooped, and do include Florida, where none of the candidates were allowed to campaign, and Michigan, where Obama wasn't even on the ballot. We didn't buy the popular vote argument for Al Gore, so we sure as hell ain't buyin' it now. Will they stop at nothing?
(Editor's note-- that was a rhetorical question. The answer appears to be "no.")
